“He’s doing with language and semantics what nations are doing with technology. Apparently, he realized that these frameworks were more sophisticated than the technologies they spawn, and he became interested in cognitive and relational methods that could outperform their mechanical offshoots.

The results were explosive, to put it lightly. He has discovered principles which empower him to engineer a peculiarly effective mode of linguistic construct. And it is contagious, in that those exposed to it somehow begin to develop the same skill.

His work involves the generation of a recursively self-informing ‘theme improvisation’ structure that doesn’t merely provide information or insight when composed or understood — it re-seeds the initial domains of correlation and synchrony that underlie intelligence, and sets up a cycling process of developmental leaps that evolves radically over time. Without wanting to wax hyperbolic, these text objects have the capacity to radically advance, reform, or correct human intelligence. And their results are as robust and unique in nearly every person or group who encounters them.

His tactics can be understood through a familiar structural analogy from immunology. The superficially attractive theme (and/or insight) is merely the suggestive ‘coating’ or shell. This acts as both a lure and a pseduomimetic validation asset employed to overcome security features of the dominant cognitive framework that would otherwise convert or reject it.

The payload is unseen and unsuspected by those who examine the seed, and, once delivered, this payload unpacks. Its dynamically active contents become recursively self-informing within the target context. It learns, with astonishing sophistication and speed -what to become- in any given context, in order to liberate that context from the forces co-opting it against its own developmental prowess and well-being. As this proceeds, the payload acquires the analog of trust-access to the foundations of the frameworks, habits and processes which it will later use to obliterate or transform the entire system.

The result is a direct and assault on the forces that inhibit, prohibit, or co-opt human intelligence — relational or intellectual. The power of this result is dramatically amplified over time. As far as we are able to ascertain, his inventions depend upon an advanced mimetic tactic that leverages structural trends inside the language of the enemy’s own communications network to overcome it. The payload then transforms itself to useful structure within the newly established context, effectively disappearing.

He is a mole, inside the mole, inside the system that assembles itself as us… and as such? He is undetectable and his capacities to transform the system know no conceivable bounds.”

— an anonymous analyst of an anonymous informant