“It is a mistake to think that familiar intervals are actually of equivalent duration. This is because, like words, at least half of the reality time is in the recipient or experiencer, not the vehicle of transmission. Time, then, exists as a superposition of duration and experiencers — a dual nature. Part of it is in the convenience of familiar measured intervals, but the other part is within us; and within us, duration hath no measure. In waking life, the structural aspect dominates, and there is the appearance of absolute regularity to intervals. But within? A moment is forever, and forever is moment.”
— an anonymous informant
0 Comments