“There are precisely zero ‘laws’ of physics, or Nature. Nature is not a courtroom, has no lawyers, and in no way resembles the concept of ‘laws’. No aspect of Nature is a law.

And what humans have derived of the underlying principles, bears no resemblance whatsoever to ‘a legal system’.

This is a catastrophic error, that arises not from ‘anthropomorphising’ Nature, but something even more stridently ignorant; rendering our conceptions of Nature in the framework of human legal systems, which are representations, and thus entirely unreal.

Our language inclines us to make myriad similar errors. “It doesn’t matter what word we select, we know what is meant by it’. This is lethal nonsense. This kind of error actively obliterates insight, revelation, awareness and the foundations of cognitive conceptions of aspects of that which Is.

None of what we take as incontrovertible, whether this be ‘the speed of light’ (it’s not a speed at all), or ‘what evolution is’, is as we imagine it. Indeed, Nature is consistent in a single feature that is as obvious as the wetness of water, or the solidity of concrete: she violates expectation, theory, and models, merely by existing. Nature is The Impossible, made manifest. Forget this, and you’ve forgotten the basis and origins of your own mind and body.

Human science is around 200 years old. Nature is unimaginably, inconceivably older. In fact, our ideas about ‘what Time is’ are as ridiculous as they are deceptive. Human science is in its »infancy. And its unjustifiable proclamations about ‘the facts’ are more absurd than we are inclined to imagine, let alone suppose.”

— those are NOT laws