Since you cannot prove the existence of that with which you prove existences… what, precisely is the value of proof?

Part of the answer is that the scope must be both appropriately limited — and delineated to those attending — such that the power is never universalized.

But it should be clear that some features of existence are amenable neither to proof nor empirical inquiry. Two aspects of such features are the uniqueness of personal experience. and anything that attempts to encompass that with which we formulate proofs or understanding…