All knowledge is necessarily the result not of understanding, but the evaluation of what I will call ‘limit-cases’ where, given the framework we applied, excluding most of everything, especially minds… the method was able to distinguish and, in some way quantify the result — a representation.

That qualifies as knowledge in the most inconceivably limited scope. A scope that actually, fundamentally, knows nothing at all… because it overlooks the actual natures of being, relation, and Origin. This kind of knowledge doesn’t know what anything is… literally.

But claims to declare identity, value, purpose, activity, potency, meaning… and anything else we like.

What we call knowledge is the result of our use of a collection of »toys… that we somehow mistook…

… for Gods.