Intellligent ethical and moral frameworks cannot be explicitly recommended or employed in a way that pervades over the more natural inclinations of real people in actual relational exchanges.

While ‘guidelines’ may serve, local circumstance, not disembodied declarations from real or possible others, must generally have precedence.

If this is not the case, communications behavior collapses into decoherence, and the participants have become mere functions intended to fulfill the implications of the ‘rules’ that have invaded our interiority … as if to set up some kind structure of mandates in place of our ordinary human inclinations… and necessities.

And yes, this is ironic, because what I am saying here violates its own suggestion… and yet, this is precisely the sort of 2nd level awareness that leads beyond the traps of an otherwise unjustly predetermined or ‘flat’ improvisational landscape.