https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/08/theres-a-debate-raging-in-science-about-what-should-count-as-significant/?comments=1

“Psychology and many related fields are in the midst of what can be viewed as a coming-of-age crisis. Following a stream of depressing revelations about a lack of reliability in the field, lots of researchers are dedicating themselves to improving the discipline’s rigor.

The latest proposal to up that rigor is a big one: 72 researchers from a range of disciplines have drafted a manuscript arguing that the threshold for claiming “statistical significance” should become much stricter. There’s often a fair amount of consensus on how science could be improved, but this suggestion has stimulated some intense debate.”

P.S: Read the comments for crucial perspectival insights.

Aug 5, 2017

004775

Post

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *