Science and ‘Religion’ are ways of seeing, they do not declare identity, ‘function’ or nature, and are, in fact prostheses rather than authorities. The ways we use them are confused, and refer, too often, to arguments and systems of description rather than reality, relationships, or anything like intelligence.

Intelligence and Divinity are not systems. They are their superposition, and this requires local, not invented ‘authority’. Those capable of understanding this are »self-authorizing. Intelligently enacted, this becomes the opposite of the ‘helpless spectator’ approach to knowledge. Without it, the results counterfeit themselves, and refer to neither knowledge nor reality… but something like their opposite: opinion.