The most crucial present answer to George’s question is that ‘we don’t’, until we actually form an organized ‘we’ that is not merely a fiction in language. Where there is no actual ‘we’ there can be no possible pursuit of insight or solutions.

Prior to that, the question itself is actually premature — there is no context (and this is definitely not one) in which it can be meaningfully pursued — because the ‘we’ in the construct is abstract, not real, not intentionally established, not existing except in language. So step one is: form an actual human social constellation that promotes and sustains this imperative, and the imperatives that surround the pursuit of the question.

Prior to that? Forget it. Little poses and text exchanges just become more noise about non-existing actions in a stream of abstract noise texts.