Cognitive Activism Moment:
The actual referent that is referred to as ‘a law of nature’ has nothing to do with law. Or even with truth. What is meant by this word ‘law’ (as should be obvious even to children) is »theory. That is, a model. A model is not a law. It is a structured perspective on some situation that »will change. Not maybe, either. It »will change. Our theories, without even »a single exception, are, in fact ‘mostly incomplete’. By mostly I mean ‘more than 99% is missing’. That is absolutely not a law. At best, it is a guideline to learning more, if that should become our actual inclination.
There are no ‘laws’ in reality. Humans invent those, and then become inclined to the most ignorant kinds of promotion behavior. For example ‘universal unalterable fact’. Well, it’s nonsense. And the sooner you recognize this, the sooner you will discover something a bit more like your own intelligence. Which, again, has absolutely zero to do with ‘laws’, and not much to do with science or religion (as ways of knowing and their cultural agendas), either.
0 Comments