Over time, one who has inner eyes develops a profound array of relationships with a peculiar feature of water’s nature, activity and surfaces. This feature is invisible to science because it lies outside of both its scope and concerns. It is also ‘impossible’. This feature is invisible to religion, because, un-co-opted, it would destroy religion. To religious thinking, this feature is »only evidence of a description of reality or god. This feature is invisible to thinking because the methods we use are inherently deceptive, yet we trust them. To these methods of thinking, this feature is ‘nonsensical’. This feature lies in a domain of »generality that humans are carefully trained to avoid. The nature of our relationships with the ‘specificity’ of language must deny features like this explicitly, in order to remain coherent as practiced. • • ** • • Water is a living doorway between worlds, minds, and moments. One cannot use the vehicle via science or thought. Some ‘religions’ have preserved carefully reframed (circumcised) fragments of this feature and deliver these as ‘proof’ that their absurd descriptions of reality ‘are true’. The feature is crucial to nature, the nature of relationships, and the nature or inhibition of intelligence. It lies outside the grasp of language or description, though, as here, both may point at this direction. All that we do with, in, near and to water… we are doing… ‘to the living between’ of all beings and minds. All moments and places. This is not ‘magical’ so much as it is true. There is no ‘category’ in language which this feature fits into because »language is one of the artifacts of the loss of contact with this feature! The water is a living between. Your essence is alike with it, recognizes itself in it, and needs to be able to develop the nature of these relationships freely and without domineering ideas and fictions occluding the nature of the waters. Because we do not understand water, literally: we cannot understand »anything. The bases from which we derive meaning are pre-damaged by this loss. They cannot be repaired without repairing the underlying essence of the problem, and that is our confused idea that ‘water is a resource’. This image shows something far more like the truth than most eyes will see. They will see what they have named and know. What I see? Leads directly to every living world, moment, and mind… in all of time. And is ‘ a metaphor ‘ of the entire situation… a perfect metaphor.

Over time, one who has inner eyes develops a profound array of relationships with a peculiar feature of water’s nature, activity and surfaces.

This feature is invisible to science because it lies outside of both its scope and concerns. It is also ‘impossible’.

This feature is invisible to religion, because, un-co-opted, it would destroy religion. To religious thinking, this feature is »only evidence of a description of reality or god.

This feature is invisible to thinking because the methods we use are inherently deceptive, yet we trust them. To these methods of thinking, this feature is ‘nonsensical’.

This feature lies in a domain of »generality that humans are carefully trained to avoid. The nature of our relationships with the ‘specificity’ of language must deny features like this explicitly, in order to remain coherent as practiced.

• • ** • •

Water is a living doorway between worlds, minds, and moments. One cannot use the vehicle via science or thought. Some ‘religions’ have preserved carefully reframed (circumcised) fragments of this feature and deliver these as ‘proof’ that their absurd descriptions of reality ‘are true’.

The feature is crucial to nature, the nature of relationships, and the nature or inhibition of intelligence. It lies outside the grasp of language or description, though, as here, both may point at this direction.

All that we do with, in, near and to water… we are doing… ‘to the living between’ of all beings and minds. All moments and places. This is not ‘magical’ so much as it is true. There is no ‘category’ in language which this feature fits into because »language is one of the artifacts of the loss of contact with this feature!

The water is a living between. Your essence is alike with it, recognizes itself in it, and needs to be able to develop the nature of these relationships freely and without domineering ideas and fictions occluding the nature of the waters.

Because we do not understand water, literally: we cannot understand »anything. The bases from which we derive meaning are pre-damaged by this loss. They cannot be repaired without repairing the underlying essence of the problem, and that is our confused idea that ‘water is a resource’.

This image shows something far more like the truth than most eyes will see. They will see what they have named and know. What I see? Leads directly to every living world, moment, and mind… in all of time. And is ‘ a metaphor ‘ of the entire situation… a perfect metaphor.