This is the kind of ‘intelligence’ your cultures are producing -en-masse-… and it is aggressive, self-aggrandizing, and lethally momentous: “If we want to give animals the same rights as humans, they damn well better take on the same responsibilities. If they cannot (because they cannot) then they do not deserve the same rights.” — Aaron Moritz, FB He is confusedly correct: animals do not deserve the same rights as humans, who actually have none other than those they can purchase… (animals have no money and are like we who do not, converted into either money, or something more valuable: information-intelligence)… they deserve -actual rights, and more of them- since… … without them there are no humans. Oh, and -we are animals-. I think your intelligence… was a fiction to begin with, Mr. Moritz. Thank you for verifying this conjecture so simply and effectively. ••• One of the most astonishingly ignorant remarks I have ever heard from a human person attempting to communicate. And thus? Incredibly valuable as an intelligence asset because its diagnostic value is, literally, ‘off the charts’. Get me? Obvious problem: the responsibilities of the animals are not representational. They -empower his mind to exist or speak- and these ‘responsibilities’ were completed -hundreds of thousands of years ago- and have been -perfectly executed every moment of every day- since then. There is one exception: His species. Which not only ignores -all- of their responsibilities as living beings, moral beings, and sentient intelligences. They rape, massacre, obliterate and amputate all of nature. And -then-? Accuse Nature… of -not accepting her responsibilities-? (This sounds so modern United States that I cannot even fathom the resemblance because it looks like the same mind!) In favor of what? Responsibilities to monsters, hate, murder, rape, lying wildly, and machines. So, actually, how about this. How about the reverse: if humans want -any rights-… they have to -measure up to the animals- FIRST?

This is the kind of ‘intelligence’ your cultures are producing -en-masse-… and it is aggressive, self-aggrandizing, and lethally momentous:

“If we want to give animals the same rights as humans, they damn well better take on the same responsibilities. If they cannot (because they cannot) then they do not deserve the same rights.”

— Aaron Moritz, FB

He is confusedly correct: animals do not deserve the same rights as humans, who actually have none other than those they can purchase… (animals have no money and are like we who do not, converted into either money, or something more valuable: information-intelligence)… they deserve -actual rights, and more of them- since…

… without them there are no humans. Oh, and -we are animals-.

I think your intelligence… was a fiction to begin with, Mr. Moritz. Thank you for verifying this conjecture so simply and effectively.

•••

One of the most astonishingly ignorant remarks I have ever heard from a human person attempting to communicate. And thus? Incredibly valuable as an intelligence asset because its diagnostic value is, literally, ‘off the charts’. Get me?

Obvious problem: the responsibilities of the animals are not representational. They -empower his mind to exist or speak- and these ‘responsibilities’ were completed -hundreds of thousands of years ago- and have been -perfectly executed every moment of every day- since then.

There is one exception: His species. Which not only ignores -all- of their responsibilities as living beings, moral beings, and sentient intelligences.

They rape, massacre, obliterate and amputate all of nature. And -then-?

Accuse Nature… of -not accepting her responsibilities-?

(This sounds so modern United States that I cannot even fathom the resemblance because it looks like the same mind!)

In favor of what?

Responsibilities to monsters, hate, murder, rape, lying wildly, and machines.

So, actually, how about this.

How about the reverse: if humans want -any rights-… they have to -measure up to the animals- FIRST?