They have relationships based on labels, categories and boundaries. We have everything else. So, they know if the person is a man, woman, child, teen, adult, worker, intellectual, lover, enemy, friend, teacher, student, mother, father, patient, criminal, wife, husband, victim, prey, messiah, pariah, bystander, catalyst, wonder, or curse, for example. We don’t. See, we have everything at once. Instead. And what that looks like is a kind of learning-intimacy that is so powerful we have to work to keep a lid on the inspiration and learning momentum that emerge, endlessly and profusely, from this ‘seeming lack of formal figurations’ about the ‘nature of the relationship and its participants’.