“The fundamental problem, you see, is the »axioms. Because these must be presumed, supposed or declared in order for proofs to exist at all. And there’s the rub; there’s no such thing as a proof without suppositions. Which, effectively, unavoidably means that proofs are not actually proofs at all. The supposition of the objective position is the shadow of the axioms presumed… and there’s no proof without those suppositions. Which means that there are no objective perspectives. Literally: zero of those. And there’s a worse problem where declarations, explicit declarations particularly, immediately become self-violating. Just as this one is….”

— infraheard