“I don’t understand, how do you seem to communicate with Nature? And you do it with people, places, and minds you have never met, too.

We do not seem to communicate. It’s like this. You know how — if you’re just suspended in space — your relationship with gravity determines the outcome? If it is strong, you will slowly settle, or fall. If it is weak or absent, you will ‘float’.

Sure.

Is there any ‘how’ to that on your part?

No.

Exactly. Why? Because you are the space. If there’s gravity, you do that. If there isn’t, you don’t. You cannot make gravity or nullify it with a technique, can you? No. It’s the same with Nature. All of it. You -are- Nature. And nothing is excluded from that. No one. No moment. No place. No relationship. The dead, the unborn, everyone.

The fact that you think there is a how? That’s the reason you aren’t simply being and experiencing nothing other than that, constantly.

As is common with highly representational intelligences, you got the question backwards. It isn’t how does one communicate with Nature. It is ‘what might interfere with one’s natural self-awareness in and as nature — so that it seems as if ‘communication’ is required and cannot be accomplished by known methods’.

You and your hand cannot be reasonably said to ‘communicate’ for similar reasons. Can you imagine the results if you tried to formally communicate with your own hand?

Oh.”

— overheard nearby