Insight is usually the result of the sudden influx of (empathy intelligence’s naturally broad seeing and understanding) into a structured field of (representational intelligence’s naturally highly focused structured models).

This generally requires two things in order to be authentic or succeed: active sensitivity to context (intimacy), and active creative engagement. For this reason it copying cannot accomplish this. Copying must by its nature discard context, and has nothing whatsoever to do with creativity — in fact, it is its assassin — except where emulation is an aspect of the learning process, but this is purposed for creativity, not distribution (copying).

When a copy is made, the otherwise forthcoming sudden influx of insight is derailed, and the otherwise powerful developmental momentum is transformed into another tokenized repetition. It’s a con, actually. This is the sign of the (representational intelligence) pretending it has mastered the (empathic intelligence), which, actually, it cannot even contact, let alone represent.

This is why copying insight is dangerous, and does not represent what it appears (which is a sudden emergence of the empathic intelligence in the field of the representational intelligence’s common domination).

It is, most often, a ‘false flag’ attack by the representational intelligence which, perfectly able to present copies out of context, parades around as if it has just done the world a great favor, when, in fact, it has done itself and intelligence a grave disservice, particularly if this mode of ersatz emulation becomes the habit.